skip to main content
article

What makes teachers use technology in the classroom? Exploring the factors affecting facilitation of technology with a Korean sample

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 January 2008Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify factors influencing teachers' decisions about using technology in the classroom setting and examine the degree to which teaching experience affects these decisions. Specifically, the items employed in this study were derived from the teachers' perceptions of technology use. We discovered six factors which influenced teachers use technology in their classroom: adapting to external requests and others' expectations, deriving attention, using the basic functions of technology, relieving physical fatigue, class preparation and management, and using the enhanced functions of technology. Interestingly, these factors do not correspond to the common sense theory of instructional technology. Additionally, we analyzed the patterns of factors' scores by teachers' level of teaching experience. From this study we deduced that although the majority of teachers intend to use technology to support teaching and leaning, experienced teachers generally decide to use technology involuntarily in response to external forces while teachers with little experience are more likely to use it on their own will.

References

  1. Berry, 1988. A cross-cultural view of intelligence. In: Sternberg, R.J., Detterman, D.K. (Eds.), What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition, Ablex, Norwood, NJ. pp. 35-38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bransford et al., 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruce and Levin, 2001. Roles for new technologies in language arts: inquiry, communication, construction, and expression. In: Jenson, J., Flood, J., Lapp, D., Squire, J. (Eds.), The handbook for research on teaching the language arts, Macmillan, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Fletcher, 1984. Psychology and common sense. American Psychologist. v39. 203Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Goodnow, 1980. Everyday concepts of intelligence and its development. In: Warren, N. (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 2. Academic Press, London. pp. 191-219.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Goodnow, 1984. On being judged intelligent. International Journal of Psychology. v19. 391-406.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jacobson and Weller, 1988. A profile of computer use among the University of Illinois humanities faculty. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. v16 i2. 83-97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jonassen, 1999. second ed. Prentice Hall, Engliwood Cliffs, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kennewell et al., 2000. Developing the ICT capable school. Rouledge Falmer, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kleiman, 2004. Myths and realities about technology in k-12 schools: five years later. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. v4 i2. 248-253.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kozma, 1994. Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development. v42 i2. 7-19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mehlinger and Powers, 2002. Technology & teacher education: A guide for educators and policymakers. Houghton Mifflin company, Boston. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. NetDay Survey, 2001. NetDay Survey. (2001). "The internet, technology and teachers" - executive summary May 2001. Available from http://www.netday.org/anniversary_survey.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. O'Hare and Duck, 1981. Implicit psychology and ordinary explanations. In: Heelas, E., Lock, A. (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies, Academic Press, London. pp. 285-302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Parker, 1997. Increasing faculty use of technology in teaching and teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. v5 i2/3. 105-115. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Pelgrum, 2001. Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education. v37 i2. 163-178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rossberg and Bitter, 1988. Microcomputer infusion project model. Tech Trends. v33 i5. 24-28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Schrempp, 1996. Folklore and science: inflections of folk in cognitive research. Journal of Folklore Research. v33. 191Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Schrum, 1995. Educators and the internet: a case study of professional development. Computers & Education. v23 i3. 221-228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Schrum, 1999. Technology professional development for teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development. v47 i4. 83-90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Smeets and Mooij, 2001. Pupil-centred learning, ICT and teacher behaviour: observations in educational practice. British Journal of Educational Technology. v32 i4. 403-418.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Snelbecker, 1999. Some thoughts about theories, perfection and instruction. In: Reigeluth Mahwah, C. (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models, Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey/London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Susman, 1998. Cooperative learning: a review of factors that increase the effectiveness of computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research. v18 i4. 303-322.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sternberg, 1985. Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Strudler and Wetzel, 1999. Lessons from exemplary colleges of education: factors affecting technology integration in preservice programs. Educational Technology Research and Development. v47 i4. 63-81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Tabachnik and Fidell, 2001. 4th ed. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Willis et al., 1999. Research on technology and teacher education: current status and future directions. Educational Technology Research and Development. v47 i4. 29-45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. What makes teachers use technology in the classroom? Exploring the factors affecting facilitation of technology with a Korean sample
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access